Found this WD SSD at a low price.
Read Speed:
3500 MBps
Write Speed:
3000 MBps
Seems like a decent W/R speed with pice 3.0.
5-Year Warranty.
I have two of these SSD and work well for the last few years.
Found this WD SSD at a low price.
Read Speed:
3500 MBps
Write Speed:
3000 MBps
Seems like a decent W/R speed with pice 3.0.
5-Year Warranty.
I have two of these SSD and work well for the last few years.
whats the DRAM, QLC, TLC situation for this drive? I dont know what any of those funny letters really means in the grand scheme of things but would be worthwhile to know
DRAM usually for caching to enhance speed for frequently access data. Speed will be much decreased without this when multiple I/O occurred.
QLC: Quad Level Cell
TLC: Triple Level Cell
which stands for density level and how complicated to find a correct data which results wear out increased. So, TLC is better in any case than QLC.
Looks like Intel 670p is better?
https://www.cheapies.nz/node/39586
https://ssd.userbenchmark.com/Compare/WD-Black-SN750-NVMe-PC…
Changing the capacity of the WD one to 1TB seems to make it ahead of the curve in a lot of those tests
Thats the black SN750 version you have linked in your comparison. The deal is for the blue SN570 version which is most likely different performance to the black
Isn't this better? https://www.pbtech.co.nz/product/HDDCRU34210/Crucial-P3-1TB-…
I would get this, it uses QLC tho but i usually upgrade before 5 years anyway.
This is 220tbw vs 600tbw so you would have to write 120GB a day for 5 years
IMO TBW even for QLC is overplayed. Far better reason to avoid QLC is it's generally a lot slower than TLC when you run out of SLC cache.
Cheapies feedback about this product
https://www.cheapies.nz/node/38500